A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones house. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each citizens of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their web page, bringing about an encroachment over a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such areas are topic to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their check out, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary efforts through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In line with sworn proof referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-higher h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality Accountant Paul Feely but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been called meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to organizing law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got described their lengthy-standing connection to the area as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple simply endeavoring to produce a household residence in accordance with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Specific Region of Conservation and say that every one operates have been completed according to Experienced tips and authorized designs. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes moving into the sea for the duration of a storm, do not change the underlying points.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from very distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket must determine whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another extended after the lawful charges have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible continue to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.